Search billions of records on Ancestry.com

KIRWIN FAMILY DNA TEST RESULTS

DYS#
Kit

 

change cell colors

Earliest Known Ancestor

Test Participant *
H
a
p
l
o
3
9
3
3
9
0
1
9
3
9
1
3
8
5

4
2
6

3
8
8
4
3
9
3
8
9
3
9
2
3
8
9
|
2
4
5
8
4
5
9
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
7
4
3
7
4
4
8
4
4
9
4
6
4
4
6
0
Y-
G
A
T
A-
H
4
Y
C
A
2
4
5
6
6
0
7
5
7
6
5
7
0
C
D
A
4
4
2
4
3
8

5
3
1
5
7
8
3
9
5
S
1
5
9
0
5
3
7
6
4
1
4
7
2
4
0
6
S
1
D
4

57296   Peter H. Kirwin EM78 13 23 13 10 16-19 11 12 13 13 11 30                                                        
  Thomas Kerwin of Castlehackett Timothy Kerwin R1b1b2
13
23
14
11
11
14
12
12
12
13
13
29
17
9
10
11
11
25
15
19
29
15-15-17-18
11 12 19-23 16 17 12                      
96483 John Kirwin arrived at the Port of New York on the
"Kalamazoo" from County Dublin in September, 1847
James Joseph Kirwin R-M269 13 24 14 10 11-14 12 12 12 13 13 30 17 9-10 11 11 25 15 18 30 15-15-16-18 11 11 19-23 14 15 18 16 36-38 12 12                  
438794
Richard Irving Wood b.1915 and d.1970
Richard Irving Wood
R-M269
13
24
14
10
11-15
12
12
11
13
13
28
17
9-10
11
11
25
15
19
30
15-16-16-17
10
10
19-23
16
16
19
17
36-36
12
12
                 
45410 Francis Marion Kirwin b. 20 FEB 1855, Shelby IN (adopted son of Patrick Kirwin - see 45409 below) William Kirwin [1] R-M269
13
24
14
10
11-14
12
12
12
13
13
29
18
9-10
11
11
24
14
19
30
15-15-15-19
11
11
19-23
16 15 20 17 36-39 11 12                  
142099 match w/non-matching surname - Joseph Albert Price b. 1813, Chautauqua Co., NY; DNA
matching Elijah Price b. 1750, Martin County, NC [2]
Barry Price M-R269
13
24
14
10
11-14
12
12
12
13
13
29
18
9-10
11
11
24
14
19
19
15-15-16-16
11 11 19-23 16 15
19
17
36-39
11
12
                 
185410 match w/non-matching surname - Robert Hill, b. 1615, Northumberland, England [2] James [Clint] Hill M-R269
13
24
14
10
11-14
12
12
12
13
13
29
18
18
9-10
11
11
24
14
19
15-15-16-16
11
11
19-23
16
15
19
17
36-39
11
12
               
114566 Thomas Kirwan Thomas Franklin Kirwan R-M269 13 24 14 11 11-14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9-10 11 11 25 15 19 31 14-15-16-17 11 11 19-23 17 15 18 16 38-19 12 12 11 9 15-16 8 10 10 8 10 11
45409 Patrick Kirwin (see line 9 in genealogy charts) Patrick Owen Kirwin [1] R-M269 13 24 14 11 11-14 12 12 13 13 13 29 18 9-10 11 11 25 15 29 31 14-15-15-17-18                                      
B29397
Patrick Early - Ireland
Timothy Gerard Early Sr.
R-L151 13
24
14
11
11-14
12
12
13
13
14
29
18
9-10
11
11
25
15
19
29
14-15-16-16
11
11
19-23
16
15
18
17
40-40
11
12
213308
Edward Erwin 1689-1772; Northern Ireland
Jack Ellsworth Irwin Jr.
R-M269 13
24
14
11
11-15
12
12
12
13
13
29
17
9-10
11
11
25
15
20
30
15-15-17-17
11
10
19-24
15
15
18
16
36-38
12
12
11
9
15-16
8
10
10
8
10
10

NOTE: Genetic differences are noted in red.

*R1b1 is the most common Haplogroup in Europe, "The members of R1b are believed to be the descendants of the first modern humans who entered Europe about 35,000-40,000 years ago ( Aurignacian culture). Those R1b forebearers were the people who painted the beautiful art in the caves in Spain and France. They were the contemporaries (and perhaps exterminators) of the European Neanderthals."

** "E3b (E-M35) was one of the Y haplogroups that was common among the Neolithic farmers from the Middle East who first brought agriculture into Europe about 9000 years ago ... E3b1a2 is found to be at its highest frequency worldwide in the geographic region corresponding closely to the ancient Roman province of Moesia Superior, a region that today encompasses Kosovo, southern Serbia, northern Macedonia and extreme northwestern Bulgaria." Eastern Africa is said to be the probable place of origin. Perhaps Thracian soldiers in the Roman Armies invading Ireland introduced this DNA pool, which is very unusual in Ireland?

[1] These two results compare the DNA of descendants of two "brothers" who were raised as the sons of Patrick Kirwin (click on the link at the top of the page for charts for Patrick Kirwin and more information). The descendant families collaborated in DNA testing because Francis (Frank) Marion Kirwin was born five months before Patrick and Martha married, thus we knew it was possible that Patrick was not Frank's biological father. The results have indeed proven this to be the case as the brothers have five DNA mismatches.

[2] Y-Search results have found exact 25 marker matches between William Kirwin's DNA and that of Elijah Price 1750 Martin Co., NC and Joseph A. Price. There is also a 25 marker match between William's DNA and that of Guy Hill of Chowan County, NC. The trick will be to find a common ancester as oral stories say one of the colonial ancestors of Joseph Albert Price changed his name from Hill to keep his family in England from the knowledge that he supported the Colonists rather that the King. This will be a horizontal search as Grandpa Frank's paternity could have come from any or the brothers in any of the generations wending their way down tohis birth in 1855 ...