The Van Norman (etc.) Y-DNA Project Results
Last updated: 30 March 2009
Your family line not represented? Join in here!
We have a match!
Two sets of results match 35 out of 37 numbers, indicating that these two lines have a common ancestor, likely
within a dateable period of time – although we know these lines have no connection after 1794 at a minimum.
Normally, the DYS numbers on the chart in red tend to mutate or change faster than the ones in black, but in
this instance, we have one of each that has changed. It is these mutations that might eventually help us determine
which line a particular Van Norman ancestor might connect to, when we are trying to knock down a brick wall
in our research, once we have a larger database of results to draw from. (This is assuming that the mutation
took place a few generations back, and is not a recent occurrence.) At this point in time, we do not know if
both mutations occurred in one line, or if they each had one, but we likely now have a good idea of the Y-DNA
of the Van Norman ancestor who settled in New York State.
You will notice that the other two sets of tests do not match this pair or each other. This indicates that we
have three different ancestors represented in the results. Because we have so few results at the moment,
there are several interpretations at this time.
The first possibility is that there are more than one Van Norman (etc.) ancestors that we descend from, who
were not originally related. This is plausible because the very origins of the name "Van Arnhem" indicate
that the original ancestor came from (or "Van") the Town of Arnhem in the Netherlands. Naturally there was
likely more than one person from that town who came to North America in the earlier years who could have
adopted this phrase a surname. Another possibility is that one or two of the lines trace back to an original
Van Norman (etc.) immigrant, and the other one or two lines are the result of one of the anomalies that we
talked about earlier -- Adoption, Illegitimacy, and Infidelity, etc. As additional participant's results
are added to our database, we will be able to get a better idea of what situations we are dealing with.
i.e. Are the New Jersey Van Normans descendants of a different line than the New York families? Are the
Pennsylvania crowd related to the New Jersey or the New York lines? - Or both? -- Or neither?? Etc., Etc.
As we stated at the start of this project, the rewards are not going to come overnight, but will benefit
researchers of the Van Norman surname over the long haul.
Also listed on the chart is a Haplogroup that is predicted for each participant. These are generalizations
used to "track" the various routes of migration of our early ancestors after they travelled out of Africa
many thousands of years ago. While the actual results can be much more detailed, depending on the line, a
general rule of thumb indicates that R1b lines are from Western Europe and R1a lines are from Eastern
Europe. (There are many more categories than just those two as well.) The Genographic Project is a large
study currently underway using this information to determine how humankind populated the earth. For more
details go to www.nationalgeographic.com and click on the
icon near the bottom left hand side of the page.
Y-DNA WISH LIST
In order to set up a workable database for our Van Norman Y-DNA research project, we need to determine the
primary line or lines. That is to say, we need to know what the defining numbers should be for the original
Van Norman ancestor. (or ancestors if we determine that there is more than one line involved)
To this end, I have drawn up a minimal Van Norman Y-DNA “Wish List” to show which samples would be desirable
to establish this base. Ideally, it is beneficial to obtain a sample from a male descendant of the first son
of an “early” couple, and from a male descendant of the last son of the same couple. These samples should be
identical, or at least virtually the same and then it is presumed that any samples from the male descendants
of any other sons born between the two are also the same. Of course, in real life, it is not always possible
to do this, if some of the descendants haven’t been determined yet or if a line “females out”, etc…..
The Van Norman “Clan” appear to have three early geographic locations of our surname and it’s variations
- New York, New Jersey, & Pennsylvania - families which we are unable to link together at this time.
In addition, we have a multitude of “brick walls” from all over, most of which can be traced back to
one of the three major centers.
So, until we have determined the actual ancestral line or lines, I have drawn up four separate groupings
to work with.
NEW JERSEY:
We require one more sample to confirm our other set of results, preferably from a descendant of Jacob
Van Norman who married Rebecca Hann / Haun. A match would establish the line back to the 1750’s….
PENNSYLVANIA:
We require a minimum of three samples from our Pennsylvania descendants. We need at least one from a descendant
of the Joseph Van Norman / Elizabeth Wybern line; one from the William Van Orman / Elizabeth line (which would
potentially give us a line for the early Isaac Van Orman of PA); and one from the Samuel Van (N)orman / (Phebe?)
line of PA. (as his ancestry hasn’t been determined yet.) If they all match, we have a set of results dating
back to the early 1700’s.
NEW YORK:
We require a sample from at least one line that can be traced back to Jan Dirksz and his wife Sarah Theunis
to confirm the primary set of numbers dating to the mid 1600’s. This could include any male descendant of
the Loyalist line who settled in the Eastern half of what is now Ontario, or one from the line that settled
in what is now Quebec, in addition to the many other lines that are now spread across the United States.
Any other Van Norman line tracing back to the early 1700’s in New York, will also be represented here.
STRAYS:
This is the category where all the ancestral “dead ends” and “brick walls” will be filed as they begin their
journey, while we wait to see if their results match up with any particular line. Over the centuries, some
lines may have a mutation and one of their numbers will change. If this mutation occurs far enough back in
time, then anyone with the same set of numbers will be a descendant, whether or not the actual connection
is known. This will assist us by giving us a direction for our research, which we might not have had otherwise.
Of course, there is always the possibility of a set of values appearing for a person that don’t match any
of the others, either because adoption, infidelity or illegitimacy, etc. was involved sometime in the past.
If you decide to participate, that is one factor you must consider.
As always, our results are posted on the Van Norman website maintained by Sherri, so you can follow our
progress. http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~vnfa
Further questions may be directed towards myself sewood@osha.igs.net or the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
section at www.familytreedna.com might also prove to be useful to you.
We also welcome donations from those who wish to sponsor a line (or make a contribution towards one) if they
don’t have any male Van Normans (etc.) available to them. You can contact me privately at my email address
above for details. Likewise, if there are any Van Norman males who wish to participate in the project, but
are unable or unwilling to spend the money to have the tests done, please contact me as well. Either of
these options can be handled anonymously if you wish.
Remember, it is strictly male Van Normans who may take the Y-DNA test, as it is only passed from father
to son. This is why it is ideal for a surname based endeavor. Thank you for your interest in our project.
Stephen
| |
New York Line |
Unassigned Members |
| Kit: |
144050 |
121451 |
122502 |
122864 |
| Earliest
Known Origin: |
Vermont? |
New York |
New York |
New Jersey |
| *Haplo |
R1a1 |
R1a1 |
R1b1b2 |
R1b1b2 |
| 393 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
| 390 |
26 |
26 |
23 |
24 |
| 19 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
14 |
| 391 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
| 385a |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
| 385b |
14 |
14 |
14 |
11 |
| 426 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
| 388 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
| 439 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
13 |
| 389|1 |
14 |
14 |
13 |
13 |
| 392 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
| 389|2 |
31 |
31 |
29 |
29 |
| 458 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
| 459a |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
| 459b |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
| 455 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
| 454 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
| 447 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
25 |
| 437 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
14 |
| 448 |
20 |
20 |
19 |
19 |
| 449 |
33 |
33 |
29 |
29 |
| 464a |
12 |
12 |
15 |
15 |
| 464b |
15 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
| 464c |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
| 464d |
16 |
16 |
17 |
17 |
| 460 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
| GATA H4 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
10 |
| YCA II a |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
| YCA II b |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
| 456 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
| 607 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
15 |
| 576 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
20 |
| 570 |
18 |
19 |
19 |
17 |
| CDY a |
36 |
36 |
35 |
35 |
| CDY b |
41 |
41 |
37 |
37 |
| 442 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
| 438 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
| 531 |
|
|
|
|
| 578 |
|
|
|
|
| 395S1a |
|
|
|
|
| 395S1b |
|
|
|
|
| 590 |
|
|
|
|
| 537 |
|
|
|
|
| 641 |
|
|
|
|
| 472 |
|
|
|
|
| 406S1 |
|
|
|
|
| 511 |
|
|
|
|
| 425 |
|
|
|
|
| 413a |
|
|
|
|
| 413b |
|
|
|
|
| 557 |
|
|
|
|
| 594 |
|
|
|
|
| 436 |
|
|
|
|
| 490 |
|
|
|
|
| 534 |
|
|
|
|
| 450 |
|
|
|
|
| 444 |
|
|
|
|
| 481 |
|
|
|
|
| 520 |
|
|
|
|
4
4
66 1
7 5
6 8
4 8
7 5
7 2
6 4
0 4
9 2
5 6 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|